Added: Nov 23, 2008
From: littleme8
Duration: 1:35
I know there are shared opinions, and many would say I am wrong, but this is my opinion, and this is from what i've been reading.American studies shows that pitbull,rottweiler,doberman and all the so called "aggressive" dogs aren't really the one who bites the most.A test in USA shows that dachs is the dog breed that has bitten the most. not recording to hospitals or anything like that, but they took several dogs from each breed and saw who we're the ones that bit the most.The chiuaua, or the so called "purse dog" is the second on the ranks.. just because their small, doesnt mean they cant bite. Jack russel terrier was on third place. Shaefer was on forth or fifth or so. Pitbull came on about 6th place or so, and rottweiler and doberman wasn't even on the top 10.
Channel: Animals
Tags: aggressive dog dogs
Rating: 1.67 (3 ratings) Views: 596' favoriteCount='2 Comments: 25
Lotiolenti Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - How does it matter whose fault it is? And why should irrepsonsible owners be allowed to keep killing machines? Because some are responsible? How are you suposed to distinguish?
littleme8 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - What you said in the end, is exacly what ive been pointing for.. i mean, ofc every dog can be dangerous, but and its mostly the owners fault, or maybe its mentally diseased or something. But what i ment by this video is that they tested who we're dogs that bit the most.. and that is what i said. Now everyone says the most agressive dogs are the pitbull,doberman,rottweiler.. well its not. Now in my opinion i should everyone should take a test before they get a dog, so they have a licence
gusatanas Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - you are afraid of dogs and you should work on that before you pass out your fear to your toddler
bulldaisymom Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - soooooooooooo right
bulldaisymom Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - How can you tell the difference... all you have to do is look at the dog, how the handler handles the dog. I would cross the street to keep away from a smaller dog before a larger dog any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Fear mongering is just plain stupid and WRONG.
bulldaisymom Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - actually they can
bulldaisymom Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - the smallest dog ( reported) that has killed is a pom.
xaverysxmamax Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - mmhmm. More ignorance is here. Those little dogs have killed people. People just don't think much of it. Also, they keep talking about the breeds you listed in the Media, because when people hear it, they keep talking about it. That's what the media likes. I love ALL th breeds you just listed, and I swear i'd like to see anyone try to take my pit bulls away from me. See the hell they'd have to get through. You can't single out a breed, just because a few have done wrong. IGNORANCE.
littleme8 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Also, which I just thought of, the reason smaller dogs are the most aggressive, is usually because theyr small! and they wanna defend themselfes, and since their small they can get really aggresive
blueblob101 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Gusatanas you are retarded. Just because a tests shows that a certain breed of dog is more agressive than another doesnt mean to say sombody is scared of the cute cuddly kind. Owned hahahha =P
littleme8 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - I'm not afraid of small dogs, I have a norfolk terrier and a dwarfen schnauzer, reason I made this vid is to show that big dogs isn't the one that bites the most and so forth. I love all dogs, my sister works with dogs, her dog is gonna become a therapy dog, I myself is gonna try to become a dog handler in the military, so dont think I'm afraid of small dogs..
xaverysxmamax Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Yes, those breeds can indeed kill someone. Maybe you should grow up and face the facts. NO ONE is taking my dogs away from me. No body is getting there fucking grimey hands on my dogs. I don't care what BSL is to tell you the truth. Banning dogs out of ignorance and fear, and not intelligence and facts.Mankind kills more people than dogs do. AND dogs will always love. Unlike a human, dogs are always loyal.
gusatanas Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - if you say so...
Lotiolenti Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Fear is a healthy feeling. Banning a breed that scares people shitless isn't the equivalent of ignorance. It WOULD be ignorant if they were unable to attack, kill, etc. But they are. And in opposition to humans are more dangerous, yes, but tend to be more communicative as well as predictable.
xaverysxmamax Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Well let's see. Dogs give warning signals, and if most people were educated, which most are not, would recognize body postures, actions, etc. But i'm not expecting people to know alot about dogs. I call it ignorance BECAUSE people don't bother to take time and learn about the breed that's being put under BSL. Believing everything the media says, or what people say, is leading to ignorance. Is it not? Any dog can attack. It's not it's fault that it can make alot, or litle damage.
Lotiolenti Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - I said that before. I don't really give a flying fuck if it's the dog's fault or not. And I do, believe it or not, have better things to do than study the body language and social dynamics of fighting dogs. Fact is, they CAN kill, they CAN hurt you, they DO scare people. How and why is pretty irrelevant.
xaverysxmamax Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Like I said, many people don't know. Do you think I sit here and study dogs body language? NO. It's COMMON SENSE which i'm not sure you have. Because if you did, you'd realize. HUMANS can kill. Humans CAN hurt you. Humans DO scare people. You don't give a flying fuck? Good for you. Because other people do. Some people are trying to end BSL. I'll be damned if my dogs get taken away because people like YOU. Facts are, human is a more dangerous species than the dog. Ignorance is bliss.
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - um wtf, so police dogs should be banned from our streetslolall dogs can place a danger, and yes chis, jacks, and dachs, have been known to kill people b4
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - oh and btw thats bullshit, Using statisitcs of fatal attacks by registored pure-breed dogs, and there total population Glen Bui found that, 0.0012% of pit bulls were involved in fatal attacks, 0.00729% of rottweilers were invloved in fatal attacks, 0.012288% of dobermans were involved in fatal attacks 0.008375% of german shepard were involved in fatal attacks, the cho came top with 0.705% of them being invloved in a fatal attack, no offense to any chows
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - heres a sugestion try asking the owner if its friendly, and they are NOT machines, by calling them machines, your practicley saying "its not so bad if someone mistreats them"
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - so can any fucking animal, a women near me was killed by a rat, you going to ban those?banning random breeds is stupid over here weve had. sever bans/ restrictions on pits, dogs, filas, and tosas, yet we are still having people injured and killed by dogs(including ones of the banned/restricted breeds, to this day.
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - a study done over here by showed that before bsl was pased in a 3 month period there were 99 reported bites, 2 years after bsl was passed the number of bites were STILL THE SAME, and the ones atributed to pit bull types, had RISEN from 3% before bsl was passed, to 5% two years afer it was passed
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - The Dutch government has acknowledged that their 15year-long ban on Pit bulls had NO effect in decreasing bite incidents.There was a fatal pit bull attack in 1986 in denver CO, the city baned pit bulls in 1989, there have been no more fatal attacks by pit bulls since 1986.BUT THIS DOES not mean it was succesful, after all portland OR also had a pit bull fatality in 1986, but they chose NOT to enforce bsl, and they have had NO more fatal dog attacks snce 1986, weras denver has (non-pit
kellogscornsnake Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - Bu this study is bollocks, different types of agression are UN-relatedlike pitbulls would socre low on territorial agression towards people, but high on dominance agression towards other dogs.and greyhounds were bred to hunt deer and boar (they can pull down quarry without stoping), and so have high preditory agression, which is exploited in races, but they are very submissive to humans
seether160796 Says:
Nov 23, 2008 - wow we should not be on the streets, who is more dangerous A DOG or a HUMAN i say human we have nukes, guns, more aggression no dogs are dangerous only the owners or they can be when they are on the defensive if they are not defensive but still bite it means they are diseased such as rabies seriously dude they should come to your hhouse every few months to see what you live like what you feed it and how you treat it, there are no agressive dogs enough said treat them right and theyll act right!